This is a bit uncomfortable to admit, but I'll say it. A handful of titles rest beside my bed, all only partly consumed. Inside my phone, I'm some distance through over three dozen audiobooks, which seems small alongside the 46 ebooks I've set aside on my digital device. That doesn't account for the expanding collection of advance editions near my living room table, striving for blurbs, now that I am a established author personally.
On the surface, these figures might look to confirm recent thoughts about today's attention spans. A writer commented not long back how effortless it is to break a person's attention when it is scattered by online networks and the constant updates. He suggested: “It could be as people's focus periods shift the literature will have to adjust with them.” Yet as someone who used to stubbornly complete whatever novel I started, I now consider it a human right to set aside a novel that I'm not enjoying.
I don't feel that this habit is a result of a brief concentration – instead it comes from the sense of time passing quickly. I've consistently been struck by the spiritual teaching: “Hold mortality daily in view.” A different point that we each have a just finite period on this planet was as sobering to me as to others. However at what previous moment in human history have we ever had such immediate entry to so many mind-blowing creative works, whenever we desire? A glut of treasures greets me in every bookshop and within each screen, and I strive to be intentional about where I direct my energy. Could “abandoning” a book (term in the book world for Did Not Finish) be rather than a sign of a weak focus, but a discerning one?
Notably at a era when book production (and therefore, commissioning) is still controlled by a specific group and its quandaries. Even though engaging with about individuals distinct from us can help to strengthen the muscle for compassion, we furthermore read to reflect on our own experiences and role in the world. Until the titles on the racks more accurately represent the experiences, stories and concerns of prospective audiences, it might be very challenging to hold their attention.
Of course, some novelists are actually successfully writing for the “modern attention span”: the short style of certain recent books, the tight pieces of different authors, and the short sections of several modern stories are all a wonderful showcase for a briefer approach and technique. Furthermore there is no shortage of craft advice designed for grabbing a consumer: perfect that first sentence, improve that start, raise the drama (more! more!) and, if creating thriller, put a mystery on the opening. This suggestions is completely good – a potential publisher, house or reader will use only a a handful of limited seconds determining whether or not to continue. There is little reason in being obstinate, like the individual on a class I joined who, when challenged about the storyline of their manuscript, stated that “it all becomes clear about 75% of the into the story”. No author should subject their reader through a series of 12 labours in order to be understood.
And I do write to be clear, as far as that is possible. On occasion that needs holding the consumer's interest, guiding them through the narrative step by economical step. Sometimes, I've realised, understanding requires time – and I must give my own self (as well as other authors) the permission of exploring, of building, of straying, until I find something meaningful. A particular writer contends for the story developing innovative patterns and that, instead of the conventional plot structure, “different patterns might help us imagine new ways to craft our narratives vital and real, persist in producing our novels novel”.
In that sense, both viewpoints agree – the fiction may have to change to fit the modern consumer, as it has constantly done since it first emerged in the 18th century (in the form currently). Perhaps, like previous writers, coming writers will revert to serialising their works in publications. The upcoming those writers may currently be sharing their work, chapter by chapter, on web-based services like those visited by countless of monthly users. Genres shift with the era and we should permit them.
Yet let us not say that every evolutions are entirely because of limited concentration. Were that true, brief fiction anthologies and very short stories would be considered considerably more {commercial|profitable|marketable
Lena is a passionate gamer and tech writer, specializing in indie games and esports coverage.